Project Description

Case study:

Using the Scout 137 for Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessel inspections

ScoutDI carried out an inspection of a slop tank onboard the FPSO SKARV while it was in operation in the North Sea. Here we faced the challenge of drone operations in environments where there is an explosion risk.

Introduction

Skarv is a Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) vessel is facility equipped for the treatment of hydrocarbons from sub-sea oil wells or nearby platforms. The crude oil products are brought on board for processing via pipeline and offloaded via shuttle tanker of delivery pipeline and the FPSO provides a flexible solution without the need to install infrastructure at the site.

Any of the cargo tanks on board the vessel can be designated as a slop tank, and it would be used to collect any draining fluid, tank washing runoff and other oily mixtures. This means that there is a possibility of airborne hydrocarbons particulates and gasses and a potential risk of explosion.

These areas would normally be a no-go zone for the operation of drone equipment as there are currently no ATEX certified drones on the market. However, the Scout 137 was able to carry out visual inspection while the vessel was in operation in the North Sea.

Results

In collaboration with a third-party testing laboratory, we were able to demonstrate that the drone system was not an ignition source during normal operation. This was demonstrated by placing the equipment (drone and ground station) a test chamber where a 4-7 vol% propane atmosphere was introduced (note: the lower explosive concentration (LEL) and upper explosive concentration (UEL) are 2.1 vol% and 9.5 vol%, respectively). The equipment was operated safely, including switching on and off, for over an hour without risk of atmospheric ignition.

Testing under such realistic conditions in normal operation allowed us to de-risk the operation prior to the inspection on board Skarv. During the inspection on board Skarv, the drone was able to operate under a hot work permit as the risk of the flight operations had been properly assessed.

There are two key characteristics of our tethered drone system that are key to its safe operation within such environments compared to battery powered drones:

  1. Since the drone is externally powered, if the system needs to be made inert in an emergency, this can be quickly done by switching off the ground station or input power. Since there is no battery on board, there is no residual risk from the stored energy within the drone system.
  2. During flight, there can often be a build up of static electricity on the drone, particularly on the propellers as they move through the air. The tether system of the Scout 137 also acts as a ground wire to draw away any static from the drone provide earthing for the system.

Conclusion 

In such hazardous environments where there is an explosive risk, the design decisions behind the externally powered Scout 137 showed their worth. We were able to demonstrate that, in normal operation, the Scout 137 was not an ignition source risk when operating in an explosive atmosphere and carry out a visual inspection of the vessel’s slop tank.

While this does not equate to ATEX certification, we continue to work with our industrial partners to develop the technology, tools, and processes for drone operations in these types of hazardous environments.

Case studies

  • OTD Energy 2021 social media banner

Stavanger, here we come: OTD Energy 2021

Save the date and note the location: Hall E, stand E-3275 (in the digitalization pavilion). We are looking forward to meet new and existing customers, partners and other industry players in Stavanger at #OTDENERGY 20-21. [...]

More news